Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MURAD ABRO versus THE STATE


Section 404040 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) need to be re-examined, the witness of the prosecution has seen the incident and the accused on the spot. The identity of the witness and the witnesses mentioned in the parade, therefore, was necessary for the mere decision of the matter, the question that forced the witness to change his statement at the trial and for what reason. Wanted to re-examine from within can be solved. The light of his statement in the re-examination depends on the sole statement of the witness, depending on the fate of the case, it would be unfair to the prosecutor not to re-examine him in the witness box and not to re-interest him. ? The sentencing of the criminal administration's appeal was denied under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.