MUHAMMAD MURAD ABRO versus THE STATE
Section 404040 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) need to be re-examined, the witness of the prosecution has seen the incident and the accused on the spot. The identity of the witness and the witnesses mentioned in the parade, therefore, was necessary for the mere decision of the matter, the question that forced the witness to change his statement at the trial and for what reason. Wanted to re-examine from within can be solved. The light of his statement in the re-examination depends on the sole statement of the witness, depending on the fate of the case, it would be unfair to the prosecutor not to re-examine him in the witness box and not to re-interest him. ? The sentencing of the criminal administration's appeal was denied under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Shankiari lawyer
