ALLAH DITTA versus NAEEM RAZA
Section 8 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the sale by the minor and his stepmother challenge such sale to the extent of their share in the matter. , The trial court dismissed, but the appellate court reversed the same decision, which the High Court affirmed in the review filed by the respondent of the Minority Evidence Matric Certificate, which was confirmed. It is clear from the above that the plaintiff was born on 14 12 1963 and was minor on 19 1980 6 1980 when there were issues relating to the sale. The question was made that despite the many opportunities, nothing could be offered in the headquarter. After a careful analysis of the proof of age factor, the High Court correctly determined that no weakness or illegality could be identified in the improper decision. Good
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Hayatabad lawyer
