Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus MESSRS HAJI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Section 17 and 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Ruling the Court's Objection to Award Rule The government's argument was that the High Court did not consider the objections filed by the government against the award of arbitration by the arbitrator. What was not authorized And is authorized to award awards under the law. The High Court order was not a speaking order but the appeal was still dismissed. Not that the High Court did not consider the implementation of the parties required for the Ministry of Defense and the Civil Aviation Authority in the proceedings, but the execution agency blamed the government on a claim that was not sustained in law. It was brought to the record from the very beginning, that the award was given by an illegally appointed arbitrator, who could not be called an award in the award law, so he was sent to the defendant. No claim was granted. The reasons for delay in filing an appeal before the High Court were shown but were not considered or the merits of the case were approved, and the decision was passed without the approval of the law and the relevant provisions of the law. Appeal allowed on consideration. The court will consider the benefits taken by the government immigration advocate from Dhirkot lawyer