Find a Lawyer

MALIK NASIM AHMAD AHEER versus WAPDA

Sections 4, 18 and 25 (1) cannot be demanded from the court for grant of reference for the acquisition of land. The landowners have filed a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. While the court increased the compensation by Rs 20,000, the High Court allowed the appeal and the extra compensation was set aside by the court, the court of justification showed extraordinary generosity and increased the amount of land. The acquisition is listed in section 25 (1). No illegal interference or weakness can be identified by the landlord of the Act, 1894, because interference with good grounds was not guaranteed by the High Court. registration advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer