Find a Lawyer

ALTAF HUSSAIN SHAH versus ABDUL QADEER

Presenting copies of the notice on section 13 Convention of Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 76 (a) and 77 pre-trial litigation notices as proof of the applicant's publication proof, Wendes received Denied, the premier presented the notice to the local postman who, according to the affidavit, said that he had handed over the envelopes to registered shopkeepers he personally knew, the Postman also stated. He made an entry in the postman's book, which Wendy's did not check for the postman act of the notice of a student's subordinate under the registered Corps AD. The evidence was on record before the Emirates proved that the shopkeepers had actual notices Secondary evidence of the contents of the documents was directed under Article 76 (A) of the Conan testimony, 1984, while Article 77 of the law evidence A party was exempted from proving a notice by submitting a prior notice in its terms; a copy of the notice was admissible in evidence. The following courts erred in judicial jurisdiction to exclude that notice on the submission of copies of the notice that both the courts had misrepresented the evidence on record during the process of deleting this document. ? The emperors' decisions and decrees were set aside by the following two courts and the case was decided in favor of the former umpires. lawer from fb area from Chak Jhumra lawyer