HUNZA PACKAGES (PVT.) LIMITED versus MESSRS ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LIMITED
Section 18 Contract Act (IX of 1872), breach of section 74 agreement, by the Bank Principals Bank to impose damages, in the present case, neither the petitioner nor any evidence has been presented so that To prove that non-payment can be made. On the hire, the bank had to bear actual damages, no document was submitted by the bank in this regard, indicating that the actual loss to the bank was due to the alleged breach of contract by the tile defendants. Had to bear, under the circumstances, the bank was not entitled to it. To recover the amount received as extra rent / old damages, the decision approved by the banking court was amended accordingly, demanding intervention.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kharian lawyer
