Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus BALDIA NOOR PUR THAL

AXXVI, Commission on Dispute Resolution on the R9 Site Following the commission's examination of the evidence on record, the court dismissed the case in which the two parties' properties were adjacent to each other. Except for the dark claim, there is no evidence on record that the witnesses regarding the transgressions by the following plaintiffs did not withhold their jurisdiction that the disputed properties were restricted so as to resolve the dispute between the parties for all time to come. O XXVI, R 9, CPC escaped with notice of the courts below. The only solution was to do full justice between the parties. If the plaintiff had indeed crossed the defendant's territory, then not only the dismissal of the case would be of benefit to the defendant, but it would be equivalent to a dagger in the hands of the defendant. does. The verdict and orders affected by the violation of the law were subject to material misconduct and the High Court approved the review petition, setting aside the unclean decisions and orders to re-send the case to the trial court, which directed it to The Revenue Specialist will appoint the Local Commission to verify both properties and further hear the case based on the evidence already recorded and the case report. online advocate from Lodhran lawyer