Find a Lawyer

ARIF BAIG versus THE STATE

The appreciation of the provisions of Sections 302 (b) and 324/34, when the FIR immediately designated the accused with a specific role, left no opportunity for deliberation or consultation, three eye witnesses suffered severe fireworks injuries. There were those who could not be fabricated, and they themselves existed. It cannot be doubted, although no eyewitness to the complainant had any prior hostility to the accused, and the other two eyewitnesses were independent witnesses who provided clear explanations for their presence on the occasion. Witnesses were questioning if the officer did not take the blood stained ground from the places where the said witnesses suffered injuries or did not take their blood stained clothing, it could be due to him being ineligible. But their presence at the scene of the incident cannot be doubted. The account was fully approved with the help of medical evidence. The accused participated regularly in the shooting of the incident by means of a rifle and the defendant and the prosecution witnesses suffered sustained injuries and they deserved some kind of relief. It was not that this event was born at that moment, or it may have worked under the command of his father, which would not have been missed. The lesser sentence was available in favor of the accused and the conviction was upheld immigration advocate from Ambela lawyer