AZAM KHAN AND 16 OTHERS versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, WAPDA, RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS
Sections 4 and 18 Land acquisition, failure to consider relevant facts assessment price hike Failure to declare award The landowners are not satisfied with the award. The matter should be referred to the Civil Court. Demand for increased compensation on execution of land three months after the issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the trial court failed to maintain the Sale of Deeds produced by the owners of the land. And the compensation provided by the authorities was retained. Owners cannot be ignored simply because it did not occur prior to the issuance of the notification because the sale period depended on by the landowners was relevant because when the acquisition of the land in the dispute and the sale took place, Of the period. Showing the market value of nearby land
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
