Find a Lawyer

ISLAMABAD STOCK EXCHANGE (GUARANTEE) LIMITED versus SHAKEEL MEHMOOD

OX, RR 8, 9 and section 151 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 filed a dismissal application for illegal proceedings on the date set for this trial, 1/2 year after the expulsion Was accompanied by a restoration request. The trial court rejected the application for time restriction under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Neither the case was set for self-hearing nor the hearing was asked on the relevant date, but the request for answers and arguments was not settled on that date, to file a case under O IX, R 8. With regard to such date, the CPC trial court did not comply with the request for a hearing. The impeachment order was invalid and the request for restitution without full jurisdiction was not barred. Because such a case would involve section 151, the CPC defendant needed to be compensated. The High Court accepted the review request. And as a response to the unshakable order costs payable 5 hzarrupy. Dante immigration advocates email from Sangla Hill lawyer