MUNIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Code (v. 1898), validation of section 103 evidence, the accused was arrested by the police party while submitting a large quantity of narcotics report by the Chemical Examiner in connection with the sample being recovered. Gone. The case was positive, both of the prosecution witnesses were civil servants who were doing public service, and the accused failed to identify the background of bitterness and ill-will between them and the witnesses said that in this kind of case. They should be prompted to falsely implicate. Under the provisions of Section 25 of Section 25 of Section 103, CCP did not apply to cases under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, Section 103 could not be violated under the provisions of CRPC. Problem
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sangote lawyer
