Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAQ versus THE STATE

Sections 302/324/337 F (ii) / 337 F (iii) / 148/149 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 617 The definition of evidence lies in the fact that the advocate on the docketing by the complainant's counsel Was drafted, it couldn't happen. Call the complaint false and the fact that the lawyer who drafted the complaint does not mean that he tried to divert the facts of the incident, giving him a sectarian ring. can go. Was immediately named in the recorded FIR, which was sufficient to exclude counsel, caution and even the possibility of the accused being falsely implicated. The complainant's presence was also in the cemetery for a funeral meal at his brother's grave and attending a meeting that took place, which was quite natural. There were four natural witnesses to the account of the eyewitness account, among them One witness was himself injured and the other witness who was injured was of different faith. Such a witness was very important as it cannot be believed that he would give a wrong statement to exclude the culprits. Tried to kill and severely injured him in the process, said the witness was the brother of one of the deceased and it was on him It cannot be believed that he would make a false statement against those with whom he had no previous enmity, further confirming the statements of eyewitnesses in which Franzek was allegedly found to have confiscated weapons. Statements were confirmed by the Medical Laboratory's Medical Officers Report. Extremely shocking evidence was on record that firearms suspects were present at the meeting on the day of the incident. patent advocate from Lodhran lawyer