MIAN AFTAB versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/148/149/337 F (iii) / 337 C (i) Guarantee, the grant of further inquiry bail issued to the accused was canceled and guaranteed. He was behind the cancellation of the case despite no challan submission at the trial, no progress was made at the trial, despite being brought on physical remand with the police for a long time, the alleged weapon was not recovered from the accused. A criminal case was also registered under Section 302 PPC. In which he named the other accused involved in the FIR, who were later acquitted of the accused, although he was present at the scene of the incident, but he was empty-handed and the firearm injury caused the other person. That was granted bail. The accused and his co-accused were the same and said that the co-accused had already extended the bail. The principle of consistency supported the accused's case. There was no charge of repetition against the accused as such. The accused was present in the case and he was a former offender.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Killa Saifullah lawyer