ZAFAR IQBAL versus THE STATE
Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 367 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) petitioner held that the trial court did not pass judgment on the accused. Section 676767 (?), not to mention the provisions of the CRPC and the relevant constitution under which the sentence was ordered, made the whole exercise illegal and invalid, it is purely a There was a technical objection because the accused was aware at the time of the trial. They were charged under Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Sub-Metal Act, 1997, and the error of not mentioning this section in the judgment did not precisely imply prejudice. The petition for leave was dismissed by the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Ambela lawyer
