In the light of the respondents, Section 173, 190 (3) and 200 amendments (XLV of 1860), section 302 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) do not take advantage of cross-sectional private complaint redressal. In the case of murder by a formerly cleared magistrate, the cross version was discharged on the basis that he was found innocent by the police in the latest investigation, through a constitutional request to lodge a private complaint through a challenge discharge order. Instead of taking advantage of alternatives to, the trial in the murder case against the applicants ended during the intervention. Period The High Court refused to intervene in the matter as such would be a wasteful exercise. The High Court had rightly refused to intervene in the matter. In such a denial of the High Court, the applicants will not face any prejudice in the appeal. Based on its facts and merits, the Supreme Court dismisses the plea and denies leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
