Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) occur because the complainant's presence and the injured witness present on the spot were, without a doubt, dismissed by natural eye witnesses. Was. Without any material contradiction, contradiction or improvement of their statements, the accused was immediately named in the FIR that he was injured, along with the role of injuring the victims. The witnesses were also closely related to each other. The backdrop of any enmity between the two, unless suggested to the suspect for false interference or suggestion for an alternative. Medical evidence and the motive for the incident had substantially confirmed the ocular account and there was no scope for a lesser conviction on the lesser charge. Was upheld in the circumstances and accordingly the leave to appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
