MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA
Section 8 West Pakistan Civil Rent Ordinance (VI of 1959), Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff filed the case when the appeal against the order of eviction was granted to the plaintiff in court. Found illegally occupying property. If the plaintiff is not a tenant under the courts, he dismisses such case as well. The plaintiff claimed that the property was purchased through an oral agreement. The plaintiff's plaintiff did not file a specific performance suit based on the alleged oral agreement, but the plaintiff did not pay the plaintiff's rent for some time, but subsequently in the appellate court, the defendant in such action It was found that the unauthorized occupant claimed to be the owner of the property and also accepted the negative possession request, both of which were contradictory. The courts determined such questions of fact after reviewing the entire record. ? , Which was upheld by the High Court. The Supreme Court dismissed the request and efused leave to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Vehari lawyer