Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT HAYAT versus HAKEEM MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

Article 10 and Schedule Para 1, the first Proviso Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the majority of the property was in the possession of the claimant because the immovable property was immovable, while the minor portion was owned by the claimant for the entire property. Was in control of the transfer. Its claimant non-claimant was that the claimant was not entitled to such transfer as the transfer of other property. Such an appeal was not raised for the first time, nor was it raised in the first round of litigation. In clause 1 of Schedule to the Homeless Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958, the claimant was transferred to the Supreme Court due to the fact that immovable property was to be preferred in the non-claim or local possession and the application was made. The removal was denied pakistani advocates FR Peshawar lawyer