Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LIMITED versus MAHMOOD ALI KHAN

Sections 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) charge of mismanaging the bank employees in charge of issuing charge sheets and dismissing / dismissing services after inquiry. After issuing and inquiring of the sheets, the service tribunal set aside the fines and, under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, the bank ordered a new action against them for the restoration of the job, the Supreme Court, 2000. Appeal for inquiry granted whether the service tribunal failed to recognize that there was no need for it. The principle of natural justice is that the person who was given the charge sheet / statement of charges, the full opportunity of a domestic inquiry and subsequently a show cause notice was also disposed of under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance. The person is entitled to a personal hearing before making a decision. , 2000; whether the Service Tribunal erred in the law, when it was found to be a commission of corruption, by ordering restitution and conducting a de novo inquiry proceeding. Whether dismissal / dismissal / suspension orders and prior to their suspension, the charge sheet, showcase notice and inquiry before the Committee is processed and approved by the Disqualified Authority and whether the employees have a reasonable opportunity of hearing before the final order of dismissal. Not provided. The Supreme Court directed the bank to rehabilitate the employees in the meantime pakistani advocates Loralai lawyer