Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AYAZ ALIAS CHEENA versus THE STATE


Sections 7 and 39C (2) (E) of the Criminal Procedure (Section XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 of the Trial Court jurisdiction after the amendment introduced in the Crimes Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 There were no hearings by the courts. , Under the Ordinance XXXX of October 15, 2001 and the jurisdiction of such courts was terminated and all such cases pending before the Anti-Terrorism Courts pursuant to Section 39C (2) (E). There was a need to be sent to the courts. The jurisdiction granted by the trial court in this case was, therefore, without jurisdiction and the appellants of the defendants charged with maintaining the sentence recorded by the court with no jurisdiction. The High Court's decision to dismiss was against the mandatory. The provisions of the law according to each decision

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Bhuawana lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.