MUHAMMAD AYAZ ALIAS CHEENA versus THE STATE
Sections 7 and 39C (2) (E) of the Criminal Procedure (Section XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 of the Trial Court jurisdiction after the amendment introduced in the Crimes Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 There were no hearings by the courts. , Under the Ordinance XXXX of October 15, 2001 and the jurisdiction of such courts was terminated and all such cases pending before the Anti-Terrorism Courts pursuant to Section 39C (2) (E). There was a need to be sent to the courts. The jurisdiction granted by the trial court in this case was, therefore, without jurisdiction and the appellants of the defendants charged with maintaining the sentence recorded by the court with no jurisdiction. The High Court's decision to dismiss was against the mandatory. The provisions of the law according to each decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Mubarik Pur lawyer
