MUHAMMAD MAQSOOD versus THE STATE
The accused's grant was not designated in Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 457/382/34 Guarantee, FIR, whereby the identity test was not conducted by the prosecutor by which the hirer There was a recovery of stolen property from the warehouse. The accused was the only evidence against him, even if this allegation was true, his case would still be subject to Section 1111, PPC, which did not meet the prohibition clause of section 7497 (1), against the accused. Further investigation is needed in the CCPC case. Considered under section 497 (2), the CCP accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer
