SHAHZAD AHMED versus THE STATE
Although the complainant / victim woman deferred to Section 324 evidence that she and her accused husband had an affair with another woman due to an illicit relationship, he had to pour kerosene on her. He was later set on fire, but no evidence was found. The doctor believed in the light of the evidence of the relevant and prosecuting witnesses. The doctor examined the complainant / victim, dismissed that he had told her that he had been accidentally burned and that he had never accused her husband of burning her. ? It was removed from the house by timely wall-spreading that when she heard her cry and entered the complainant's house, her husband found a blanket on the complainant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Mir Ali lawyer