Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN QAYYUM versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, LAHORE

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Three Independent for Review of Article 185 Examination of Civil Engineering Examination, Two Appellant's Papers for Praying to the Supreme Court Due to Hostility and Misconduct by Engineering University And after the re-review of the nominees who were nominated to the first position in such papers, the University did not, despite such a position, declare the result of the Appellant, on which the Supreme Court awarded the University. Announcing his result and instructing him to issue the required certificate, the university asked the applicant He was not invited to participate in the convocation, on which the Supreme Court once again instructed the university to formally award him degrees and medals, but the university handed him over to Cell Cell University, so that the appellant's ability was assessed. To apply it will require a practical and verbal examination of last year's appellant. He thought that the university would not give him a fair deal in such a case. The court appointed a former superintendent engineer for this purpose. Such an engineer informed the appellant of all his technical years that he was able The relevant sectional work, practical and in vivo voice exams of last year's articles are excellent as per the marks obtained in the relevant theory papers. The court accepted the appeal by instructing the university to inform the applicant of the results, giving them all the medals, certificates and requesting the engineering council to register them as engineers. family advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer