ABDUL RAUF versus CHAIRMAN, ADBP, HEAD OFFICE ISLAMABAD
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) dismissed by a public servant claiming that he preferred appeal before the service tribunal against the dismissal of service, but the opinion of two members of the service tribunal civil servant It was removed in view of. He claimed that as far as he was concerned, he was also found to be failing to perform his duties, so, at best, he was entitled to the same treatment imposed on another civil servant. In view of the nature of nature. His job cannot be held responsible for approving the loan on fake petitions, as such punishment by the department maintained by the service tribunal did not agree with the gravity of the charge. To consider the convictions raised by a civil servant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Pirpai lawyer
