Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI versus THE STATE

Section 396/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) A witness testimony to the prosecution's testimony, citing the number of accused Was completely different. In its statement under Section 161, the CCPC prosecution witness changed the number of suspects from 3 to 2 and stopped disclosing the presence of other witnesses at the location and time of the incident even though they had their presence. Revealed. His statement was recorded under Section 161, according to the PC statement that the statements of the PC were recorded three days after the incident and said that the evidence of delay requires careful scrutiny. The story was inconsistent as stated in the FIR and no explanation or reason was assigned. By testimony about changing the number of accused immigration advocate from Phool nagar lawyer