MOULANA MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 151 and Owen XI, R9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition dismissed due to absence of applicant and absence of his lawyer, if application for rehabilitation was not dismissed and his On the date of hearing of the lawyer, the applicant filed a petition for restoration of the application at a later date stating that neither the applicant nor his lawyer was present before the High Court nor was it deliberate. Was deliberate, but also because of the unaware of the history of the matter being talked about in the technical history of the court B cannot be reasonably explained by saying that the date of the hearing was not noted or not provided by the office. It was a usual practice that the parties and their lawyers were mentioned in the list of causes which was considered sufficient notice on the publication and distribution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer