DEPUTY DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE, SUKKUR DIVISION, SUKKUR versus MUHAMMAD LAIQUE
Rr 4 (1) (b) (ii) and 4A Sindh Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, Rr 23 (c) and 24 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973, Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212). (3) Appeal to the service-mandatory retirement public servant was accepted by the Chairman of the Division Bench of Service Tribunal and the sole member was authorized to hear the case of public servants involved in major fines by the full bench. The Service Tribunal, which provided for the exceptional circumstances of the Sindh Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), in relation to the tenure of its Chairman and two members, when for any reason the Tribunal If the member was unable to sit on the bench, nothing was in the record to indicate the circumstances under which the chairman and a member of one of the tribunals heard the appeal, instead of accepting such an unusual situation on false assumptions. Must be removed from the record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
