IN RE: SUO MOTU CASE NO.4 OF 2003 versus IN RE: SUO MOTU CASE NO.4 OF 2003
Article 184 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 SO Moto Action, under the Sessions Judge's Supreme Court report, revealed that the couple had contacted the police to provide protection, but on the contrary they had a relationship. Was handed over to Since the police reports in this case contradict the Sessions Judge's report, the Supreme Court has referred the matter to the Inspector General of Police of the province to personally look into the matter to ascertain the person. The responsibility of the police officers concerned in their involvement in this matter, not to conduct an inquiry / inquiry unilaterally, was acknowledged by the police officers in the court as having serious malfunctions in the inquiry / investigation. Located by
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Daud Khel lawyer
