ZULFIQAR ALI versus GHULAM RASOOL
Constitution42 (197 (3 1973)), Article (for for ()) of the Constitution of Pakistan shall be forfeited by the claimants (the heirs of the deceased) to claim, the trial court has made such a case in favor of the defendant. But the appellate court and the high court decided in their favor. Plaintiff's claim was that the authenticity of the execution or the disease was not challenged before the Revenue Officer, where, on the contrary, the deceased's son stated that his father deprived him of his inheritance rights through such will. Is. Prior to the trial, the parties agreed that the copy of the receipt submitted by the defendants would be read as part of the evidence. That as a minor witness DW stated that such a will was made by the deceased. And that the appellate court and the High Court's finding were based on non-reading of false statements and records.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Satyana Bangla lawyer
