DOST MUHAMMAD versus GHAUS MUHAMMAD
Under Section 17 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) award, the court fader (the defendant) transferred all his inheritance from the two wives to the family through the family settlement some children (the plaintiff) later sued. On claiming the land, the father (defendant) filed a lawsuit against him, in which he received the award, with which the court ruled, the father in the following suit by the other heirs. The consent denied to affect such award was neither party to the previous case, which was mediated nor the court award rule. Was heard about them before the queen if the father, as the courts had found, he already set by the family settlement of land was transferred to his heirs. In both cases, the marriage did not prove to be a declaration, but if the alleged alleged gift from the father was proved, it would have no effect on the previous settlement. will have. For this reason the parties had become the owners of the suit land. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition and refused leave to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer