CH. MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 9 and 22 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 suite of customer's decision to exclude nomination filed on the basis of a re-adjudication order , Was not denied the fact that the lending company was the successor to the partnership film, of which all the plaintiffs were partners, the first being the director of the lender company, the second being the brother of the plaintiff and the third plaintiff. The son's son, who was acquired by the bank earlier, was retained by the High Court. In the appeal filed by the plaintiffs, the defendant was sued by another
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Bagh lawyer