Find a Lawyer

SAJID NASEER CH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (CONSOLIDATION), PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Strength Scheme No one shall be subjected to serious injury. In 2002, recipients complained that they had not heard before the Board of Revenue passed the order. There is a possibility that no one should be heard in any matter other than the well-entered and determined principles of natural justice. Affecting its rights and interests, there was a specific provision in the law, namely, Article 13 of the Ordinance 1960 of holding West Pakistan stability on this matter, to all persons who will be given a hearing under the provisions of Section 13. (4) The West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, while dismissing the opportunity of hearing and denying the opportunity for a hearing, ignored the applicants, the law and the principles of natural justice, the Board of Revenue Board abused and prosecuted the case. Was dealt by because the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the parties as it recognizes the right of the parties. The outcome of the judicial determination cannot be overlooked or ignored by the Appellate Amendment Forum, whereby the Executive Disposition Order, approved by the Board of Revenue, was set aside and provided for all parties to have a hearing. The matter was subsequently remanded to the Board. Allowed accordingly list of supreme court advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer