Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD DIN versus SECRETARY COOPERATIVE, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Section 22A & 50A Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Treatment Alternatively to Retaining Cooperative Societies During an audit banning loss recovery time appeals Not applying for defamation of delay, the Cooperative Society's accounts, the auditor found the applicant responsible for the loss and was recommended to recover damages under Section 22A & 50A of the Cooperative Society Act, 1925. , The appeal was dismissed from the applicant by the appellate authority. The prohibition taken by the applicant, along with the appeal, he filed for contempt of deferment, which was proposed in the appellate authority's office, therefore, the successor in the office does not remove the restriction. Kriska when it was banned. A petition filed under the Limitation Act, 1908, and no order allegedly passed, may be requested to delay the filing of an appeal under Article 199 of the Constitution, where the law provided no, And appropriate and alternative treatment appeals were provided that were not taken within the time set by the applicant. By filing a restrictive appeal by law, the applicant cannot be considered to benefit from such a remedy. The recovery order approved by the authorities had reached the deadline and it was believed that the applicant had lost his credibility to file the constitutional petition. Dismissed in circumstances patent advocate from Dargai lawyer