MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 bail, the accusation of the charges against the accused and the co-accused, who has already been granted bail on the matched bail, was not a witness to the incident. ? An FIR was lodged on the information provided by witnesses who, in their statements under Section 161, had the CIPC acquitted the accused and his co-accused accused with the same responsibility. His partner was not distinguished from the accused and he was a prominent and, under further investigation in the meaning of section 497 (2), he was also entitled to bail under the CRPC and the rule of consistency. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khoski lawyer
