Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MESSRS NAZIM POLY SACK (PVT.) LIMITED versus NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI


AXXI, Rr 23A, 58, 59 & 60 The suit for recovery of the bank loan was pronounced and the judgment property was ordered to be attached by the banking court. , Rr 58, 59 & 60, CPC directed the court to discharge the immovable and immovable properties from the affiliated banking court, declaring them to be under AXI, R23A, CPC 5, 00, 000, which was not deposited by the decision-maker. The request for the objection was dismissed by the bank, the order holder, resisting the application of the objection by filing a reply, against which the initial objection was raised, O XXI, R 23 A, the accuracy of the CPC banking court. Non-compliance of the provision, although the decision to submit Rs. 5,00,000 to the required use of the powers obtained under Directive O XXI, R 23 A, CPC, is still appropriate for the judge to comply with the said order. Opportunity not provided, as there was an unpleasant order passed in the absence of judgment of the lawyer of the banking court, in the circumstances, the management of the lawyer for the judgment Or if the decision-maker had failed to comply with the terms of the order under O XXI, R 23 A, C, PC, it would have been in the fitness of matters so that another opportunity to deposit the amount. Provided, however, that under the direction of the High Court, the question arises (in the first appeal), so that the order of the Banking Court was complied with and there was no obstruction in furthering the order of the Banking Court when 5, Due to non-compliance with the submission of Rs. 00,000, the request for the objection was dismissed when the result was obtained on the basis of its merits.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.