Find a Lawyer

ROZI KHAN GOJAR versus MST. REHMAT BIBI

Refusing to file a case after the dismissal of the application under Sections 12 (2), 115, A VII, R 11 and O XXIII, R 1 Section 12 (2), the CPC earlier case was withdrawn and its Against such dismissal order, the defendant had filed an application under section 12 (2), CPC, which was also dismissed, against the dismissal of his application under section 12 (2). Instead of reaching the top forum, the CPC resorted to filing an illegal case for retaliation. The trial court, in view of OI XXII, R 1 (3), rejected the appeal of the case against the rejection order granted by the trial court, and the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court. As a plaintiff, the plaintiff resorted to unlawful filing in the present proceedings which was unlawfully affected by the provisions contained in O XXIII, R 1 (3), a CPC order approved by the appellate court. Was illegal and the out-of-jurisdiction that was set aside and the trial court restored was allowed to modify the circumstances immigration advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer