MST. BIBI GULA versus NAIMATULLAH
Section 42 Limitations Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 45 Title 1945 Declaration of endorsement of certified sales was declared in the interest of the plaintiffs in 1995 What was Do not challenge his occupation for longer than 71 years, nor did the plaintiff plead in his claimant, nor did he specify in his statements before the trial court that the time should be identified when the defendants sued the property. And how they were in possession of the suit property. For so long, through the credible evidence, the defendants proved that their forefathers had purchased the property of interest from the plaintiffs in the interest of the plaintiff and that they had also been in physical possession and since its purchase Standing on the ground and enjoying its effects were owned. The defendant's possession of the land in question as defendant's suit was protected by the Plaintiff's FS was withheld over time, but both the lower courts also failed to admire them and established them. The jurisdiction had failed to be exercised properly, and the decisions passed by the two courts in favor of the plaintiffs were set aside and were dismissed as a result of the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Bhera lawyer