Find a Lawyer

FATEH MUHAMMMAD versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR

Sections 4, 6, 18, 23 and 54 Acquisition of Land Compensation Landowners are not dissatisfied with the amount of land acquired by the referee court as the Land Acquisition Collector filed a reference before the Civil Court which was filed with the Civil / The referee was rejected by the court. And the owners of the acquired land had filed an appeal against the referee's decision. The landlords claimed that the value of the land acquired by the Land Acquisition Collector and the Land Acquisition Judge / Referee was retained by the court. Can be used for construction work and the potential value of the said land was not taken up by the Land Acquisition Judge / Referee Court. Landlords further argued that the adjoining lands were sold at a higher price to the landlord. The record has proved that the land covered was of the 'Mayara' type and was located remotely in a village with no water source and no electricity supply. Which was recognized by the Law of Determination of Compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. 1894 Landlords who claimed that adjoining land was sold at a high price, failed to provide any evidence in this regard. Landowners, in the circumstances, failed to prove that their land was desirable. Was obtained at a lower rate. Land acquisition was dismissed, against the order of the collector, in relation to the determination of the value of the land acquired by the referee court, online advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer