STATE versus KHUDA DAD
Article 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article \ 185 (3) Remedies for Abduction Crime. The complainant was not a witness, the accused did not know the prosecution witnesses, the person did not witness the abduction incident while his sister was sleeping in the room at the time. Abducted witnesses told the complainant to take the complainant with the victims. Both the prosecution witnesses stated in their statements before the trial court that the suspects did not know about them prior to their occurrence and both the accused were residents of both cities and witnesses did not get a chance to see the accused before the incident. Was. The Impact Trial Court properly acquitted the accused, the trial court did not face any unlawful interference in the trial court's decision and was based on a proper evaluation of the evidence But the Supreme Court refused to intervene. At the same time, the trial court refused to appeal the leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Rajanpur lawyer