Find a Lawyer

QAZI FAZAL AHMAD versus RIAZ-UR-RAHIM

In the absence of a son, the inheritance of the daughters was shared by the title of the shareholder, in connection with the approval of the dispute inheritance under which the entire property of the deceased owner was transferred, the two daughters were named by the plaintiff. In the present case, the entire property could not be inherited by the daughters and it was invalid to sell the land more than their share of the daughters. In the absence of a son, the two daughters cannot inherit the entire property under Islamic law and both may receive a share of 2/3. The remaining 1/1 of the land transferred to them depends on the deceased owner's suicides and they became joint owners with the two daughters. The suit did not restrict the declaration that the land created by the daughters More than 2/3 of the sale was invalid and thus was ineffective against the 1 / 3rd of the collateral suit filed by the plaintiffs. The partial decision was rendered and the plaintiff and other suicidal landlord sued the landlord. 1/3 of the site was entitled. The sale of more than 2/3 of the shares was illegal and ineffective against the rights of suicide bombers, according to which the Supreme Court allowed the appeal. famous lower court advocate from Tando Jam lawyer