Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus PERVAIZ IQBAL.

Section 4 Advance Increase, Formerly discharged from Circular Letter Government employee was appointed divisional head draftsman in Punjab Highways Department The basic qualification for this post was matriculated with science, as per notification No 1991 1991 Government employees allowed. Was. On the improvement of his qualification, the civil servant passed the BA exam and he was given two increments which was given on 15 11 1992, after which the authorities improved on the nature of qualification by public servants. To withdraw the increment on the basis of the Finance Department's explanation. The service tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the public servant and the order to withdraw the increment was set aside. In accordance with the new paragraph added to the circular, it was decided to withdraw such advance increment under which all The paragraph was not available in the original circular. Because of the high qualifications given to C, two advanced increments to C, the iv man who received the circular letter cannot be equated to any legitimate piece of legislation and this cannot have a precedent effect on the release of a civil servant. After the date two advance increments have not been entitled. Circular with new additional subparagraph which had no effect on increase in term of employment before issuance of clarification cannot be withdrawn from advance increments given to the civil servant. The Supreme Court has directed that civil pay be paid. No deduction will be made. The servant had paid before the date of issue of the amended circular appeal was dealt with accordingly. immigration advocate from Chilas lawyer