Find a Lawyer

MST. SADDO MAI versus ALI TAHIR SHAH

The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) failed to prove that the trial court had dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a declaration by the plaintiff claiming to be the owner on the ground of negligence and adverse possession. Their foremost interest was to enter into a dispute. Notor could not have obtained any document to record the land as a result of the claimant to establish all the terms and conditions of the notice to the parties and the plaintiffs are shown in the Revenue Record as the tenants of the disputed property were not declared their owners. Which is the plaintiff's position. The tenants were affected by a trust that could not succeed on the plaintiff's adverse possession request based on valid oral evidence based on the affirmative oral evidence dispute settled by the courts on the basis of oral and documentary evidence in favor of the plaintiff. Was retained on a critical assessment of the petition filed by the High Court. Supreme Court dismisses plea and denies leave jobs for fresh advocates from Haveli Kahuta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes