PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS---PETITIONERS versus RAHAT-E-ALAM AND OTHERS ---RESPONDENTS
Section 20 General Clause Act (XX of 1897), Section 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Grant of Selection Grade to Telephone Operators The first 5 notifications issued by the Board with the approval of the Federal Government, BS 11 to operators. Approved BS 8 to 11 Second Notice dated 22 5 1997 BS did not issue a second notification only to operators of Overseas Division (Gateway) in which the first notification was issued which the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal. What will be considered is the legality of both such information and whether they are both complied with under Section 20 of the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991 The use of options granted was issued by a competent authority. Regardless, a second notification has been issued by the competent authority to exercise its power to create a separate clause in connection with the telephone operators operating on the Gateway Exchange. Whether there were discrimination between telephone operators working on the Inland Exchange and those working on the Gateway Exchange. Can the first notice, which was legally created in favor of foreign exchange operators, be issued by issuing a separate notification after its implementation? And how will the Tribunal's conflicting decisions be affected by the applicant?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
