COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE PESHAWAR versus ABDUL WAHEED
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Service of ad hoc appointments, elimination of political appointments Non-compliance of appointment procedure for appointment of public servants The services of public servants were terminated because they were not appointed. Was. Due to political and external pressures, appointments were made rather than appointments, the service tribunal set aside the suspension order and government employees were reinstated on the ground that the appointment authority had at any stage made the initial appointment. Did not apply his mind freely, and other authorities issued orders that the appointment of public servants was made without following the prescribed procedure for appointment and that there was no further need for government Employees should be appointed by the competent authority if the proposed action is the relevant authority Was not complied with by the civil, the servants could not be held responsible for being responsible and responsible for the work performed by the competent authority which resulted in their being employed by the civil servants. He has served for more than ten years and has lost all his opportunities. Get a new appointment elsewhere when they become ineligible due to excessive pressure. The bread-earners were acting mechanically without any realm in the appointment of their families, and therefore, due to the serious and mechanical actions of the civil servants, they could not be bothered, the Supreme Court approved the service tribunal. Refused to interfere with the decision. Authorities did not comply with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Pirpai lawyer