SHEIKH AMJAD AZIZ versus HAROON AKHTAR KHAN
Sections 67 and 69 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Provincial Assembly Selection of Retired Candidates (Appellant) Not the Graduate Election Tribunal together with the Appellant Election Commission as the Retired Candidate. Announces more votes than. The appellant issued a notification in favor of the respondents against the decision of the petition of the Election Tribunal and demanded the appeal from the Supreme Court to prevent the defendant from taking the oath till the decision of appeal. Such appellant did not challenge such notification in the appeal. The Appellant was found to be ineligible to contest or represent the constituents of his constituency unless the appeal was decided, the constituency could not be left without representation, especially when the respondent lost the election by a margin of 1005 votes. Was, if for some reason the Appellant was disqualified, then at least the Respondent, who did not qualify to represent the constituency, was reported by the Election Commission as the successful candidate. That, in fact, is a strong factor in their favor, so the balance of convenience will be on its side, the Supreme Court has given Request deleted. Relief
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Daska lawyer