Find a Lawyer

PIO KHAN versus SAR ANJAM KHAN

Section 12 (2) and O XX, R 14 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OV, R 3, OI, R 5, OX, O XXVI, R 9 and O XXXIII, R 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 ( 3) The application under section 12 (2), CPC read with the OLXNIII, R6 reading of the Supreme Court Rules 1980, the petitioner claimed that he had entered the country. Claimed to be out of Like the tenant (defendant) as a tenant in 1988, the case was a fake and fraudulent document, and the decree was obtained by forfeiting the registrar of the Supreme Court without making it a party to the proceedings. (Defendant) filed in 1990 and was ordered simultaneously by the trial court and the appellate court, which was presented by the High Court in review. The High Court decision was postponed in the appeal filed by Pramtar and the trial of the year-long trial was rescheduled. Due to non-challenge, the purpose of submitting such an interim application by the applicants before reaching the final threshold of any competent forum in 1989 was to frustrate the entire decision regarding suit land, which was neither It was neither legitimate nor encouraged to begin a new era of litigation. criminal advocate from Shangla lawyer