Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 53 and 172 (1) (2) (xviii) Declaration of Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), Section 115 Jurisdiction of the Revenue Record Dispute Resolution Civil Claims the Court Plaintiff. Owner of the suit land and alleged that the trial court's Revenue Record Trials Court dismissed the case as a result of the fraud, while the appellate court allowed the appeal and the defendants ruled in favor of the defendants. That is their jurisdiction. Civil courts were barred by the plaintiff seeking a declaration of title to the land as their proper owners as a result of preventing the defendants from interfering with their possession. Was not withheld and the provisions of section 172 (1) (2) (xviii) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, did not attract jurisdiction which included a dispute of facts and the decision of the Civil Court Can be lifted and the section 5 clause of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 was implemented by the civil suit plaintiff to the party affected by the wrong registration It must be procured through oral and documentary evidence. The High Court, using its scope of review, cannot reproduce the evidence unless false statements and unrepresentative statements are disclosed. Readings were identified and the decision passed by the appellate court remained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
