NAZAR HUSSAIN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHAKWAL
For a participant in the possession of a Section 9 suit, there are two remedies for eviction. One suit for separate possession by division; and the second case according to the terms of section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, the plaintiff, in the present case, being a co-participant, the second treaty specifically stated that He was dismissed two weeks before the institutional suit, but the trial court did not decide the issue settled in this regard. If it was decided in favor of the plaintiff in this case, he would have filed an injunction for possession. Eligible, the trial court, in this case, dismissed the trial only to dismiss the trial in a slip way. The trial court's decision to bar the plaintiff from time to time without discussing the evidence on the record was unpleasant because the plaintiff had the plaintiff's suit land being cultivated by the tenant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Parachinar lawyer