Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus SAJIDA KHATOON

A. XXI, R 58 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Implementing Order for Proposal of Section 3 Mortgage Property, High Court of Appeal Holder Inserts Declaration for Mortgage Property Prediction, Property Objector Filed an application under O XXI, R. The CPC, 58, asked to withdraw the attachment because he was the buyer of the property, the petition was dismissed by the High Court, the complainant filed Rule 58 of the High Court of OSXI. What was, the CPC had previously considered the existence of an affiliate. The objection was that the property was not liable to be attached. No valid attachment, even if the validity is implemented, the object under O XXI, R 58, was ineligible for sale in the CPC mortgage decree if the defendant / appellant intends to redeem the mortgage, Can decretal money within a specified period power of attorney advocate Zahir Pir lawyer