AHMED versus THE STATE
Sections 200, 203 and 436 Direct Complaint Denial of Direct Complaint Initially, in the case of such complaint, there was no locus standi to take part in the investigation phase proceedings, if the direct complaint was to be dismissed. If the procedure was terminated by the procedure, the presence of the accused was not necessary. The accused was not required to join the respondent where the complaint was not issued to the accused directly after the complaint. Referring directly to the cause dismissing the complaint stating that the property was the result of a marital dispute However, the dispute and allegations of the complaint were only introduced by the complainant to exacerbate the situation and it did not appear to be true that the Additional Sessions Judge had any reason to seek the non-speaking order of the Additional Sessions Judge. He couldn't stay that way.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Swabi lawyer
